MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120749832 · doi:10.3917/sas.013.0108

Les conceptions de l’injustice des personnes itinérantes montréalaises judiciarisées

2020· article· fr· W3120749832 on OpenAlexaffabout
Isabelle Raffestin

Bibliographic record

VenueSciences & Actions Sociales · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesInjusticeSociologyPhilosophyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article s’intéresse à la perception qu’ont les personnes itinérantes de leur judiciarisation, soit le fait d’entrer dans le système judiciaire suite à la réception de constats d’infraction. Elle entraîne différents effets négatifs sur la vie de ces personnes, bien au-delà de la dette judiciaire. Ainsi, toutes vivent de l’injustice mais ne l’expriment pas de la même manière et leur expérience de la judiciarisation et des conséquences qu’elle occasionne accentue des dénis de reconnaissance (Honneth, 2000). Basée sur 29 entrevues réalisées à Montréal auprès de personnes itinérantes, cette recherche permet d’établir quatre conceptions de l’injustice vécue en raison de la judiciarisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.029
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSciences & Actions SocialesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207