La didactique du roman libertin à travers les expressions figées sur la beauté féminine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but de notre étude est d’analyser l’importance didactique concernant certaines expressions figées, venant des romans libertins du dix-huitième siècle, dans l’enseignement de la littérature française. Il sert pour identifier non seulement la fonction de la beauté dans la littérature libertine, mais aussi la spécificité d’expressions figées précises, fréquemment utilisées par les romanciers libertins au dix-huitième siècle. À l’exception de Laclos, les écrivains libertins sont traditionnellement exclus des programmes scolaires ou universitaires italiens parce qu’ils ont été longtemps jugés comme scandaleux en raison du sujet de leurs écrits. Ainsi est-il impensable de proposer l’étude de Sade dans l’enseignement secondaire. On veut alors montrer comment ces expressions figées permettent d’aborder la littérature libertine de façon différente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it