MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120966819 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-11108

I Used to Speak in Tongues: Spirituality and Pentecostal Deconversion Narratives

2015· dissertation· en· W3120966819 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Connolly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiritualityPluralism (philosophy)RationalityNarrativeSociologyLiberalismIndividualismAestheticsGender studiesReligious studiesPoliticsPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceArtEpistemologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation examines Pentecostal deconversion narratives in memoirs byKim Barnes and Dennis Covington, in novels and short stories by Lee Smith, and in promotional interviews with Katy Perry and Megan Fox.They feature protagonists who grow out of Pentecostalism.In most cases, they are young girls who are raised in Pentecostal homes and leave their homes and religions at the same time.In place of Pentecostalism, the protagonists adopt a spirituality that is either liberal or neoliberal.Liberal spirituality encourages experimentation and assimilation of various religious practices and beliefs as long as they complement classic liberal values like individualism, freedom, rationality, pluralism, etc. Neoliberal spirituality is very similar, but it redefines the classic liberal values with a market sensibility so that freedom becomes freedom in the market, and rationality becomes self-interested rationality based on cost/benefit analysis.In most cases, these protagonists' spiritualties fall somewhere on a continuum between liberal and neoliberal extremes.The narratives privilege these spiritualties as more modern, more empowering, and more in keeping with contemporary American values.They also help position the authors as people who are educated, modern, and liberal in their approach to religion.By contrast, the conservative theology and ecstatic religious practices of Pentecostals are represented as oppressive, narrow minded, dogmatic, and most of all, irrational.By extension, Pentecostals themselves are underdeveloped, uneducated, and anachronistic.In fact, while conservative Protestants as a whole occupy an "othered" position in relation to both liberal and neoliberal spirituality, Pentecostalism becomes the epitome of "bad religion" because it embraces ecstatic experiences.iii These narratives serve three compatible purposes: 1) they promote and celebrate liberal and neoliberal approaches to religion; 2) they help establish and solidify a religious/spiritual identity for the author, and by extension, membership within a religious/spiritual community (although it is an amorphous, undefined community); and 3) they provide access to a large "spiritual but not religious" audience, which embraces consumerism.To accomplish all three of these aims, the narratives use Pentecostalism and Pentecostals as a foil, a caricatured other onto which they project exaggerated negative traits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.031
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesFrench-language works237,207