MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diabetes Analytics and Recommendation Engine (DARE)

2020· article· en· W3120982506 on OpenAlexaff
Joe Samuel, Zied Bouida, Pooria Shafia, Mohamed Hozayen, Leen Yassin Kassab, Lama Kassab, Mohamed Ibnkahla

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Computer scienceDiabetes mellitusAnalyticsArchitectureAnomaly detectionModular designData scienceMedicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes is a chronic disease affecting over 415 million people worldwide. Effectively managing glucose levels on a daily routine is crucial to maintaining a healthy and threat-free lifestyle. In this paper, we propose the Diabetes Analytic and Recommendation Engine (DARE) Architecture to harness personal technologies in assisting type two diabetic patients to manage their glucose levels through a rule-based system coupled with anomaly detection and threat forecasting in a context-driven environment. To this end, the proposed DARE Architecture takes a modular approach in applying machine learning techniques to predict glucose levels and provide context-driven recommendations effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.248
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207