MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120988520

Agent-based modeling and simulation of earthmoving operations

2015· article· en· W3120988520 on OpenAlexaff
Allan Jabri, Tarek Zayed

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTask (project management)EngineeringConstraint (computer-aided design)Set (abstract data type)Resource (disambiguation)Representation (politics)TruckIndustrial engineeringComputer scienceSimulationSystems engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulation has been used in construction modeling for decades, especially in large scale operations, such as earth moving, where heavy and costly equipment is used. Simulation can be used as a planning tool to analyze the time and cost of earthmoving operations. Current methods used in simulating earthmoving operations are based on Discrete-Event Simulation (DES), with recent efforts to introduce System Dynamics (SD) in a hybrid DES-SD approach. However, due to the predetermined nature of Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) models, some inflexibility is experienced when modeling earthmoving operations, which translates into a higher degree of difficulty in regards to model creation and a reduced accuracy of outputs. Although the introduction of System Dynamics (SD) contributed significantly to accounting for qualitative factors and strategic aspects of earthmoving operations, there still exists a need for enhancing the accuracy of capturing the logistics of these operations in a smart and flexible manner. \nWith the advancement of computational capabilities, Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation (ABMS) is rapidly replacing the conventional simulation techniques. This thesis introduces Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation (ABMS) as an effective tool for modeling earthmoving operations. First of all, it provides a generic methodology introduced for creating Agent-Based models for construction operations, based on a set of rules and criteria. Then, an Agent-Based (AB) model for earthmoving operations consisting of bulldozers, loaders, haulers and spotters is developed. The model in question governs the process logistics, information sharing, equipment properties as well as activity durations. Finally, a Java-Based software application (ABSEMO) is developed as an implementation of the proposed Agent-Based (AB) simulation model. Overall, the desired outcome is to create a smart system that has a flexible logic in addition to a good representation of model operations. \nA real-life case study of a riverbed excavation in a dam construction project is simulated using ABSEMO and the results are compared with those obtained from Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) models for verification. A percentage difference of 0.42% from the DES results was finally obtained, indicating that the model’s logic and flow of resources are indeed accurate. The proposed Agent-Based (AB) methodology and the developed model aim at enhancing current practices of modeling earthmoving operations by looking at these operations from an individual Agent-Based (AB) prospective. This allows the capturing of realistic behaviors, through crafting agents’ attributes, roles and interactions. The proposed methodology can be extended to general applications in construction management, where heterogeneity can be accounted for through replicating the different participants of construction projects in Agent-Based (AB) models as well as studying the emergent behavior of their interactions on the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207