MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120993947 · doi:10.1089/andro.2020.0012

What’s Testosterone Got to Do with It? A Critical Assessment of the Contribution of Testosterone to Gender Disparities in COVID-19 Infections and Deaths

2021· article· en· W3120993947 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abdulmaged M. Traish, Abraham Morgentaler

Bibliographic record

VenueAndrogens Clinical Research and Therapeutics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTestosterone (patch)DemographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Mortality rateDiseaseGerontologyInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the short time since severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (henceforth referred to as coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) appeared, numerous articles have suggested that testosterone (T) may be a major contributor to infection and death since more men than women die, and two proteins involved in viral host entry are thought to be upregulated by androgens. We investigated whether the available data supported this supposition. A MEDLINE search was performed with keywords of COVID-19 variations and androgens or T. Data regarding COVID-19 infections and deaths were obtained from the literature, the World Health Organization, and the U.S. Center for Disease Control, GLOBAL HEALTH5050 and the Harvard School of Public Health Gender Science Laboratory. Studies with T measurements in COVID-19 patients were reviewed. Studies investigating the relationship between T and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) expression were reviewed. Global and U.S. data reveal that infection rates in men and women are similar. Men accounted for 58% and women 42% of global deaths. U.S. data revealed a ratio of 54% male deaths to 46% female deaths. However, this finding was inconsistent, as several countries reported greater numbers of female deaths, for example, Canada, Portugal, Finland, and Vietnam. In the United States, 23.5% of states and territories reported more deaths among females. Highest death rates for men and women occurred among the elderly, when serum T is at its lifetime nadir, and low death rates were observed in young adults when serum T is at its peak. All four studies reporting T measurements in COVID-19 patients indicated that low T levels were associated with adverse outcomes, that is, transfer to intensive care unit or death. Although several studies did show androgenic upregulation of TMPRSS2 and ACE2 in prostate, and cancer cell lines of prostate and lung, human and murine lung tissue fails to show a difference in expression between males and females. Observed data fail to support the popular notion that androgens contribute meaningfully to COVID-19 infection and severity of illness. On the contrary, these data raise the possibility that low T may be responsible for disease severity. There is no evidence that androgens upregulate key proteins involved with COVID-19 infection in lung. The possibility that T therapy may aid management of hospitalized COVID-19 patients merits investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.264
GPT teacher head0.550
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAndrogens Clinical Research and TherapeuticsSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207