MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121017406 · doi:10.1080/07038992.2020.1865792

Modeling Watershed-Scale Historic Change in the Alpine Treeline Ecotone Using Random Forest

2020· article· en· W3121017406 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
David R. McCaffrey, Chris Hopkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsEcotoneWatershedEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyLand coverGeographyRandom forestCanopyClimate changeLidarAltitude (triangle)Hydrology (agriculture)EcologyRemote sensingLand useGeologyHabitatMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historic changes in Alpine Treeline Ecotone were modeled using 21 topographic, climatic, geologic, and disturbance variables in a random forest model. Airborne LiDAR and oblique historic repeat photography were used to identify changes in canopy cover in the West Castle Watershed (WCW), Alberta, Canada (49.3° N, 114.4° W). A Random Forest model was trained on ∼30% of the watershed which was observable in oblique imagery, then used for a spatial extension to predict change classes in the unobserved regions of the watershed. Overall accuracy of the model was 77.3% and kappa showed moderate agreement at 0.56. The relative strength of each prediction variable was compared using permutation importance. Fire exposure, annual temperature, and annual solar radiation were the highest-ranking variables; canopy cover decreases on warm, fire-exposed aspects at high elevations, and increases on cool, non-fire-exposed aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207