MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121036543 · doi:10.31438/trf.hh2006.88

WIREBONDER ASSEMBLY OF HINGELESS 90° OUT-OF-PLANE MICROSTRUCTURES

2006· article· en· W3121036543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroelectronicsFinite element methodMechanical engineeringPlane (geometry)Die (integrated circuit)Rapid prototypingReliability (semiconductor)Point (geometry)Computer scienceRotation (mathematics)SoftwareEngineering drawingEngineeringStructural engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel design and analysis for the assembly of 90 out-ofplane microstructures using a standard microelectronics wirebonder is presented. The microstructures can be assembled by a single point actuation and use a selectively compliant spring system that converts an in-plane motion to an out-of-plane rotation. The single point actuation can be provided by a standard microelectronics wirebonder. A wirebonder is a common piece of equipment for microelectronics packaging and therefore the assembly method described here introduces a practical and economical approach. The microstructure designs were fabricated using either PolyMUMPs or a prototyping process developed at Simon Fraser University that uses SU-8 as a structural layer. The designs were modeled using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software ANSYS, and tested for positional repeatability and reliability verifying the proof of concept.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207