MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121077854 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v40i2.34878

Destouches e Goldoni tra nobildonne, arcadi e liberi muratori. Percorsi della riforma del teatro comico italiano del Settecento

2020· article· it· W3121077854 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gianni Cicali

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2020
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La riforma del teatro italiano promossa da Carlo Goldoni a metà del Settecento ha avuto dei momenti preparatori. Tra le fasi importanti di questa preparazione si devono includere le traduzioni di testi teatrali francesi di Destouches, drammaturgo aristocratico e accademico di Francia. Inoltre, questi segnali di una pre-riforma si notano particolarmente in ambienti legati all’illuminismo, all’aristocrazia e alla Massoneria in Toscana, regione in cui il giovane avvocato Goldoni soggiornò per alcuni anni. Un altro elemento sono le donne della nobiltà italiana che in alcuni casi non solo recitano da dilettanti i testi del francese durante eleganti villeggiature ma a volte li traducono o li fanno circolare tra compagnie significative di attori e attrici. In questo saggio vedremo questi antecedenti formativi della riforma di Goldoni e in particolare una traduzione di un testo di Destouches che si rivela importante per le persone coinvolte e che era sfuggita agli studi sui rapporti tra Goldoni e Destouches e la riforma del teatro italiano del Settecento.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207