Ansiedade, Traços de Personalidade e Carga Interna Objetiva em praticantes de paraquedismo: Revisão Sistemática
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo resumir la literatura publicada anteriormente sobre la modalidad de paracaidismo, centrada en las áreas de psicología, fisiología y psicofisiología. Las plataformas y bases de datos electrónicas utilizadas para la investigación bibliográfica fueron: Web of Science, MEDline y Scopus. Se seleccionaron 21 artículos después de pasar por los criterios de selección. Teniendo en cuenta el área de estudio, encontramos tres artículos en el campo de la fisiología, ocho artículos en el campo de la psicología y 10 artículos en el campo de la psicofisiología. Los instrumentos utilizados para recopilar datos relacionados con la medición de la frecuencia cardíaca (FC) fueron principalmente los monitores Polar HR y ECG Holter. En los estudios de ansiedad, el instrumento más utilizado fue STAI - State Trait- Anxiety Inventory, complementado con la recolección de muestras salivales a través de la prueba de cortisol. Para estudiar los rasgos de personalidad se utilizaron: SSS- Sensation Seeking Scale - V, NEO PI-R, EPQ-R - Cuestionario de personalidad revisado de Eysenck y TAS 20 - Toronto Alexitimia Scale. En general, predominaban las muestras de hasta 25 sujetos con experiencia en la modalidad y hombres. A pesar del uso predominante de algunos instrumentos, los procedimientos utilizados fueron bastante diversificados y no hubo una metodología unánime y consensuada. This systematic review aimed to summarize the previously published literature on the modality of parachuting, centered on the areas of Psychology, Physiology and Psychophysiology. The platforms and electronic databases used for bibliographic research were: Web of Science, MEDline and Scopus. 21 articles were selected after going through the selection criteria. Taking into account the study area, we found three articles in the field of Physiology, eight articles in the field of Psychology and 10 articles in the field of Psychophysiology. The instruments used to collect data related to the measurement of heart rate (HR) were mainly the Polar HR and ECG Holter monitors. In anxiety studies, the most used instrument was STAI - State Trait- Anxiety Inventory, complemented with the collection of salivary samples through the cortisol test. To study the personality traits were used: SSS- Sensation Seeking Scale - V, NEO PI-R, EPQ-R - Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and TAS 20 - Toronto Alexitimia Scale. In general samples up to 25 subjects with experience in the modality and male were predominant. Despite the predominant use of some instruments, the procedures used were quite diversified and there was no unanimous and consensual methodology. Esta revisão sistemática teve o objetivo de sumariar a literatura publicada anteriormente acerca da modalidade de paraquedismo, centrados nas áreas da Psicologia, Fisiologia e Psicofisiologia. As plataformas e bases de dados eletrónicas utilizadas para a pesquisa bibliográfica foram: Web of Science, MEDline e Scopus. Foram selecionados 21 artigos, após passarem pelos critérios de seleção. Tendo em conta a área de estudo, encontramos três artigos no âmbito da Fisiologia, oito artigos no âmbito da Psicologia e 10 artigos no âmbito da Psicofisiologia. Os instrumentos utilizados na recolha de dados relacionados com a medição da frequência cardíaca (FC) foram sobretudo os monitores de FC Polar e ECG Holter. Nos estudos de ansiedade o instrumento mais usado foi STAI - State Trait- Anxiety Inventory, complementado com recolha de amostras salivares através do teste de cortisol. Para estudar os traços de personalidade foram utilizados: SSS- Sensation Seeking Scale – V, NEO PI-R, EPQ-R -Questionário de Personalidade de Eysenck revisto e TAS 20 - Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto. Na generalidade amostras até 25 sujeitos com experiência na modalidade e do sexo masculino foram predominantemente utilizados. Apesar da utilização preponderante de alguns instrumentos, os procedimentos utilizados foram bastante diversificados não existindo uma metodologia unanime e consensual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".