Influences intergenerationnelles sur la perception de prestations d'assurance-chomage au Canada et en Suede
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise a determiner dans quelle mesure le recours a l'assurance-chomage (a.-c.) d'un jeune adulte est conditionne par le recours anterieur a ce programme et par le recours d'un parent a l'a.-c. La capacite de determiner jusqu'à quel point la correlation intergenerationnelle du recours a l'a.-c. est ou causale pose un defi methodologique de taille. Nous examinons a la fois la premiere demande de prestations d'a.-c. et la sequence complete de demandes sur une longue periode a l'aide de deux methodes permettant de neutraliser l'heterogeneite non observee. L'analyse est axee sur des donnees longitudinales se rapportant a une cohorte de jeunes hommes canadiens et suedois. Les resultats indiquent que le recours d'un parent a l'a.-c. reduit la periode precedant la premiere demande de prestations au Canada mais non en Suede. Le recours subsequent au programme canadien est influence par les antecedents parentaux au chapitre de l'a.-c. En Suede, l'effet d'apprentissage des individus par leur utilisation anterieure de l'a.-c., et non les antecedents familiaux, constitue le principal facteur determinant des recours repetes au programme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".