MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Analytical Study of Low Energy Monitoring Networks for Large-Scale Data Centers

2020· article· en· W3121155888 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehdi Jafarizadeh, Rong Zheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHarbin Institute of Technology
KeywordsScalabilityComputer scienceNetwork packetComputer networkDefault gatewaySoftware deploymentCloud computingReliability (semiconductor)Wireless sensor networkKey (lock)Bluetooth Low EnergyReal-time computingBluetoothWirelessTelecommunicationsDatabaseComputer securityOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental monitoring using wireless sensors plays a key role in detecting hotspots or over-cooling conditions in data centers (DCs). However, monitoring a large enterprise or cloud DCs requires the deployment of thousands of sensors distributively with an operational time over months or years. Low Energy Monitoring Network (LEMoNet) is a two-tier Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) based protocol for DC monitoring that leverages multi-gateway packet reception in its top tier to mitigate the unreliable BLE communication in the low tier. In this paper, we develop an analytical model to study the scalability and energy efficiency of LeMoNet in large-scale DCs. The accuracy of the model is validated through extensive event-driven simulations. Evaluation results show that LEMoNet can achieve high reliability in a network of 4800 nodes at a duty cycle of 15 sec (or equivalently, at an aggregated traffic load of 66Kbps per advertisement channel).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBluetooth and Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207