Représentations et constructions identitaires chez Pierre-François-Xavier de Charlevoix
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le troisième tome de l’édition de 1744 de son Histoire de la Nouvelle-France , Pierre-François-Xavier de Charlevoix emprunte la forme épistolaire pour relater « un voyage fait par ordre du roi dans l’Amérique septentrionale ». C’est l’occasion pour l’historien d’emprunter momentanément la posture de l’essayiste et de revisiter les lieux communs sur les Sauvages dans la perspective singulière de leur rapport à l’éloquence. Mais, en lieu et place d’une relation objective des pratiques observées, dont l’enjeu serait d’exposer simplement ce qu’il a vu, Charlevoix opte pour le registre épidictique et entreprend de faire l’éloge des compétences oratoires des autochtones de manière contrastée, confrontant les identités sauvages et européennes à travers une construction rhétorique informée d’abord et avant tout par des connaissances livresques et mise au service d’une ambition prescriptive et morale plutôt que descriptive et anthropologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".