Rare Surgical Complication of <i>In Vitro</i> Fertilisation Treatment: Bladder Injury During Oocyte Retrieval
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current literature suggests that surgical complications from oocyte retrievals (ORs) are uncommon. Here, we present a rare case of bladder injury during OR and its subsequent management. A 37-year-old nulliparous woman underwent assisted reproductive therapy (ART) for primary infertility secondary to anovulatory cycle. During OR, there was an inadvertent puncture of the bladder, with active intra-bladder bleeding seen on transvaginal ultrasound. Bladder washout followed by continuous drainage was instituted with antibiotic coverage over several days. Bladder integrity ascertained through computer tomography urogram and cystoscopy were unremarkable. She was discharged well and continued with her fertility treatment. Transvaginal OR is associated with few complications. Bladder injury, albeit rare, can present with massive hematuria and hemodynamic instability. Early identification of the injury is key to management with insertion of the indwelling urinary catheter, hemodynamic resuscitation and bladder irrigation. With a urological multi-disciplinary approach, most bladder injuries can be resolved non-invasively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".