MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3121237937

The use of a multi-modal approach in the rehabilitation of a pre-operative grade 3 ACL tear in a world-level Poomsae athlete: a case report.

2020· article· en· W3121237937 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Edgar, Mohsen Kazemi

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnterior cruciate ligamentMedicineRehabilitationPhysical therapyPhysical examinationReturn to sportPhysical medicine and rehabilitationGynecologySurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This case is designed to aid practitioners in understanding the potential role of multi-modal care with vibration rehabilitative exercise for a complete ACL tear in a high-level Poomsae athlete. CASE PRESENTATION: A 16-year-old male world-class Poomsae athlete presented with a right ACL rupture and LCL sprain. An extensive clinical examination and imaging confirmed a right grade 3 ACL tear. Due to the complete tear and impending participation in World Championships, a pre-operative rehabilitation strategy was implemented with treatment modalities aimed to accelerate return-to-play. SUMMARY: An appropriate clinical history and physical examination of the knee is required when instability is present. Imaging is indicated when testing criteria are positive. Clinicians should be aware that multiple therapies can each serve a role in conservative care to better suit patient demands, especially at high levels of sport. In the article, the author proposes a tailored protocol using vibration rehabilitative exercise, bracing, vibration therapy, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and laser to improve healing and sport-specific outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques→French-language works237,207→