MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121262575 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4454149

Exploration on Use of Shear Wall in Multistory Building with Seismic Analysis

2021· article· en· W3121262575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shubham Sharma, Kapil Bhutani, Arun Bhardwaj

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismic loadingEngineeringEarthquake resistanceForensic engineeringEarthquake engineeringCivil engineeringWork (physics)MasonryBuilding codeSeismic resistanceGeotechnical engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The widespread domain of the application of the shear walls in the technological arena has paved the way for the number of research works concerning their seismic behavior. It is highly essential to study the seismic behaviour of such structural components to determine their stability and suitability during earthquake of varying intensities. This present chapter deals with the previous studies on seismic behaviour of shear walls.Guidelines for Epoxy Grouted Dowels on Seismic Strengthening Projects [Wylli Jr. 1988]: This study is a guide to epoxy grouted knees in earthquake strengthening projects. Often, it is necessary to strengthen existing concrete structures to improve earthquakes, either after a devastating earthquake or to prepare for the next stage. This work often involves the installation of new concrete or metal parts on existing buildings. Doxy crushed pellets are suitable for this purpose because of the strength and flexibility of the installation of epoxy resins on anchor dowels or installed rods. Short-term loading of docks from earthquake loading does not prevent further concern and as torches are compacted within the weight of the concrete, there is sufficient installation to protect the epoxy from heat sources such as fires. Architectural Climate Development Guide [National Research Council of Canada, 1995]: This study is in the Architectural Climate Development Guide. Most of the buildings in earthquake-prone areas across Canada were built before a better understanding of earthquake resistance. Many of these buildings can be considered unsafe by existing building codes and the same situation in India and, because the code requirements are written for the construction of new buildings and not an inspection of existing buildings, the cost of upgrading the existing building. A collection of other existing building inspection procedures was then prepared by the NRC and published in the Guidelines for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings (later called "National Exploration Guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207