Multisection Combined Gysel–Wilkinson Power Divider With Arbitrary Power Division Ratios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the design of a microwave multisection combined Gysel-Wilkinson (MSCGW) power divider (PD) with arbitrary power division ratios, wide bandwidth (BW), and high power-handling capability (PHC). Exact design formulas for the N-section PD are derived in the form of closed-form equations through even- and odd-mode analysis. In addition to the novelty of the structure itself, a straightforward design approach is presented based on the known analytical techniques to offer a guaranteed optimum design. The design approach is validated theoretically, analytically, and experimentally through measurements for simultaneously large BW and high PHC for several cases with different number of sections and power division ratios. Results confirm the BW of two-, three-, and four-section PDs as BWN=2= 75%, BWN=3= 90%, BWN=4= 100%. Besides, compared with other similar works, the presented PD proves to be superior in terms of isolation, insertion loss, and compactness; making the proposed PD a very good candidate for microwave/mm-wave power divider/combiner applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".