MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121462649

The Case of the Vanishing Quebec Physicians: How to Improve Access to Care

2014· article· en· W3121462649 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueC.D. Howe Institute Commentary · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamily medicinePrimary careFamily doctorsHealth carePopulationMedicineDemographyWork (physics)Public healthGeographyNursingPolitical scienceSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compared to most Canadian provinces, Québec is endowed with a large and fast growing number of family doctors relative to its population. In spite of this, Québec’s family physicians and the general public regularly report that provincial residents have poor access to healthcare services. This Commentary examines this paradox, looking at what has held back past reforms to primary care and what to do about it. In 2012, there were 115 family doctors in Quebec for every 100, 000 people, compared to 100 in Ontario and 109 for Canada as a whole. But roughly 15 percent of Quebec patients report not having a regular family doctor compared to about 4 percent of Ontarians. Further, 68 percent of Quebecers reported having a “somewhat” or “very difficult” time accessing after-hours care versus 58 percent of Ontarians. Why? Quebec physicians tend to spend less time at work than their counterparts in Ontario. Quebec stands out as an exceptional case among most developed countries for the shortest physician’s work week at 34.9 hours, compared to 43 in Ontario. Younger doctors (under age 45) work even less, at 32.7 hours per week. Quebec also has fewer enrolled patients per physician, 1, 081 on average compared to 1, 539 in Ontario. These numbers are lower still for younger doctors. Over the last decade, Quebec has attempted, with little success, to improve primary-care access with the creation of family health teams. But Quebec’s Groupe de Médecine Familiale expansion has been fraught with delays and, even where groups have sprung up, they are enrolling a much lower number of patients than desired. A renewed, determined effort at primary-care reform with stronger financial incentives and commitment from governments and providers is required. Financing these teams through a mixed capitation system that encourages patient mobility, registering with family doctors and physician accountability in meeting access benchmarks should go a long way to strengthen the pursuit of better access for patients. Such a model could be extended in the future to allow primary-care givers greater budgetary control to purchase some basic services on behalf of their patients. Physician buy-in and a willingness to provide more primary care in the community as opposed to hospitals are key ingredients of a successful transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it