MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121492292

Organization of African Unity and African Union Engagement with Refugee Protection: 1963-2011

2013· article· en· W3121492292 on OpenAlexaff
Marina Sharpe

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Development
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College Saint-Jean
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeCharterConventionPolitical scienceCommissionInternally displaced personHuman rightsLawPublic administration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper consolidates knowledge of OAU and AU engagement with refugee protection from the time of the continental organisation's founding in 1963 up to the end of 2011. It begins with an overview of each organisation. The paper's third section is devoted to what was the first and remains perhaps the most significant achievement in the field of refugee protection: the drafting and adoption of the 1969 OAU Convention on the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa. Section four relates to OAU engagement with refugee protection subsequent to the adoption of the Convention in 1969, beginning with OAU refugee protection bodies. Each is addressed in turn, beginning with the Commission of Ten on Refugee Problems in Africa. This is followed by the Bureau for the Placement and Education of African Refugees and then the Coordinating Committee. Select special refugee protection initiatives, in the form of conferences and summits, are then addressed. A final sub-section relates to legal instruments in addition to the 1969 Convention of relevance to refugees and adopted under the auspices of the OAU, namely the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child. The fifth section of the paper relates to the AU, the OAU's successor organisation. It begins with a discussion of AU refugee protection bodies: the Permanent Representatives Committee’s Sub-Committee on Refugees, Returnees and Internally Displaced Persons; the Coordinating Committee on Assistance and Protection to Refugees, Returnees and Internally Displaced Persons; and the Department of Political Affairs’ Division of Humanitarian Affairs, Refugees and Displaced Persons. The second sub-section focuses on select special refugee protection initiatives, again in the form of conferences and summits. Finally, an additional legal instrument of relevance to refugees and adopted under the auspices of the AU – the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa – is discussed. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, having been formed under the OAU and persisted under the AU, is the subject of the paper’s last substantive section. This is followed by a final concluding section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicHuman Rights and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207