MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

L’agenda progressiste et les accords commerciaux de nouvelle génération

2021· article· fr· W3121545799 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Stéphane Paquin, X. Hubert Rioux

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventions économiques · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesEthnologyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’agenda « progressiste » ou « inclusif » en commerce international consiste, selon le gouvernement du Canada, en une perspective nouvelle qui contribue aux priorités gouvernementales en matière d’économie, de société et d’environnement. L’idée de base est que les bénéfices du commerce international doivent être mieux répartis entre tous les citoyens. Les raisons de ce positionnement du Canada sont nombreuses. Le gouvernement est conscient que les citoyens du Canada, mais également de plusieu...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventions économiquesSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207