MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121547380

Information Acquisition in Interdependent Value Auctions

2007· preprint· en· W3121547380 on OpenAlexaff
Dirk Bergemann, Xianwen Shi, Juuso Välimäki

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2007
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAuction Theory and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsInterdependenceCommon value auctionStochastic gameMicroeconomicsContext (archaeology)Value of informationInformation structureValue (mathematics)Information asymmetryEconomicsComputer scienceMathematical economics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider, for example, the situation in which a number of established companies bid for the takeover of a target company. At the outset, all bidders are symmetrically informed but before submitting a bid, each bidder may hire a consulting firm to assess the value of the target company. The value of the target company may depend on the extent to which the asset (or activity) of the target firm matches that of the acquiring firms. In addition, if the bidders are competing with each other in the (product) market, then the quality of the match between the target firm and firm i also matters for firm j. In this paper, we analyze the bidders ’ private incentives to acquire information in such interdependent value models and establish a comparison between the equilibrium level and the socially optimal level of information acquisition. If the auction designer has a utilitarian welfare objective and valuations are private, it is transparent to see that the agents have the correct incentives to acquire information in a socially optimal manner. In the Vickrey auction, individual payoffs, when viewed as functions of own type only, coincide with the sum of payoffs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicAuction Theory and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207