MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121548944 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2020-0211

First report of <i>Phyllactinia chubutiana</i>, nom. cons., on <i>Vallesia glabra</i> (Apocynaceae) in Mexico

2021· article· en· W3121548944 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rubén Felix-Gástelum, Karla Yeriana Leyva‐Madrigal, Francisco Roberto Quiroz‐Figueroa, Norma Gabriela Rodríguez-Mora, Ignacio E. Maldonado‐Mendoza, Silvia Espinosa‐Matías, Guadalupe Arlene Mora‐Romero

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowdery mildewBiologyBotanyMyceliumConidiumApocynaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new record of the powdery mildew Phyllactinia chubutiana, nom. cons. (= Oidium insolitum, Ovulariopsis insolita) was documented on pearl berry [Vallesia glabra (Cav.) Link]. No teleomorph was observed. This novel record was identified as a member of Ovulariopsis, based on the morphological characteristics of the anamorph (hyphae, conidiophores, and conidia), and its hemi-endophytic mycelium in V. glabra correspond to P. chubutiana, nom. cons. A Phyllactinia-specific primer pair was designed for the ITS region of the nuclear rDNA. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed the identity of the powdery mildew specimens found in V. glabra in Sinaloa, Mexico. This is the first ever report of this powdery mildew in V. glabra, and the second report world-wide on a member of the Apocynaceae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207