Prediction of Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) with Silica Fume Using Neural Networks Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) is a relatively new type of concrete with high workability, high volume of paste and containing cement replacement materials such as slag, natural pozzolana and silica fume. Cement replacement materials provide a wide variety of benefits such as lower cost, reduced consumption of natural resources, reduced carbon dioxide emissions and improved fresh and hardened properties. SCC is used in many applications such as sections with congested reinforcement and high rise shear walls and there is a need for the prediction of the performance of SCC used. Artificial Neural networks (ANN) are widely used in civil engineering for the prediction of the performance of some engineering materials such as compressive strength and durability. However, currently, studies on SCC containing silica fume are very rare. In this paper, an artificial neural networks (ANN) model is developed to predict the compressive strength of SCC with silica fume using the Levenberg-Marquardt back propagation algorithm based on a database from 366 experimental studies. The model developed was correlated with a nonlinear relationship between the constituents (input) and the compressive strength of SCC (output). To evaluate the predictive ability and generalize the developed model, other researchers' experimental results were compared with the model prediction and good agreements are found. A parametric study was conducted to study the sensitivity of the ANN proposed model to some parameters such as water/binder ratio and superplasticizer content. The model developed in this study can potentially be used for SCC compressive strength prediction with very acceptable results and a high correlation coefficient R2=0.93. The developed model is practical, easy to use and user friendly. Doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091642 Full Text: PDF
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it