MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121630296 · doi:10.3917/agora.087.0007

Des bacheliers professionnels en STAPS sans illusions, mais « motivés »

2021· article· fr· W3121630296 on OpenAlex
Magali Danner, Carine Érard, Christine Guégnard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgora débats/jeunesses · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education, Recreation and Sports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIllusionPolitical sciencePhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Des bacheliers professionnels déjouent les statistiques en s’orientant vers l’université. Cet article souligne le poids des engagements sportifs sur des parcours vers l’enseignement supérieur, les (dés)orientant vers des études en sciences et techniques des activités physiques et sportives (STAPS). Loin d’être dans l’illusion notamment d’une possible conversion de compétences sportives en réussite académique, ces bacheliers atypiques évoquent très largement leur orientation risquée et/ou osée. Ces jeunes, qui tentent d’échapper au destin social associé à leur baccalauréat, sont toutefois animés par une autre croyance tenace, celle de l’importance de la « motivation ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it