An Effective Rotational Invariant Key-point Detector for Image Matching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional detectors e.g. Harris, SIFT, SFOP... are known inflexible in different contexts as they solely target corners, blobs, junctions or other specific human-designed structures. To account for this inflexibility and additionally their unreliability under non-uniform lighting change, recently, a Sparse Coding based Key-point detector (SCK) relying on no human-designed structures and invariant to non-uniform illumination change was proposed. Yet, geometric transformations such as rotation are not considered in SCK. Thus, a novel Rotational Invariant SCK called RI-SCK is proposed in this paper. To make SCK rotational invariant, an effective use of multiple rotated versions of the original dictionary in the sparse coding step of SCK is proposed. A novel strength measure is also introduced for comparison of key-points across image pyramid levels if scale invariance is required. Experimental results on three public datasets have confirmed that significant gains in repeatability and matching score could be achieved by the proposed detector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".