MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121683183 · doi:10.46532/jsm.20200901

An analysis on E-Business in Manufacturing Logistics

2020· article· en· W3121683183 on OpenAlexaff
Jain Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnterprise resource planningBusinessProcess managementSupply chainSupply chain managementCloud computingInformation technologyBusiness processKnowledge managementComputer scienceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In manufacturing logistics, the selected software products and organizational processes provide reliable and suitable applications in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Nonetheless, because of the sudden change and enhancement of Information Systems (IS), some potential remedies are outdated and have to be reviewed and replaced with modern IS. As such, the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) frameworks can be considered as well. This paper evaluates E-Business in manufacturing logistics while reflecting advanced Supply Chain management (SCM) frameworks for SMEs, data mining and cloud computing. After evaluating the elements and issues of the change management in enterprises, this contribution focusses on Dynamic AX and Systeme Anwendungen Produkte (SAP) which is the ERP systems with reference to manufacturing logistics. In this business segment, the requirement for long-lasting and supporting remedies with technological application is fundamental. Currently, there is just a slight variation in technological application, but there is a significant change in how business flows in SMEs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsFrench-language works237,207