Alfonso X, Pero da Ponte e il «trobar natural». Sull’interpretazione di «Pero da Ponte, paro-vos sinal» (B487/V70)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La prima parte di questo contributo ridiscute le ipotesi interpretative formulate fin ora sulla cantiga di Alfonso X, Pero da Ponte, paro-vos sinal (B487/V70) con particolare attenzione alle proposte di Vicenç Beltran (2005) e di Carlos Callón (2011), entrambe poco soddisfacenti: la prima per questioni cronologiche; la seconda perché fondata su interpretazioni poco convincenti e mal argomentate del testo di Alfonso X e di altre cantigas di Pero da Ponte. La seconda parte riesamina i legami di Alfonso X con la lirica provenzale: si studia il significato del sintagma trobar natural ―che rinvia a una precisa contrapposizione ideologica attiva nelle prime generazioni trobadoriche (in particolare Marcabru e Bernart de Ventadorn)―, e si indicano come possibili moventi della satira di Alfonso X due cantigas di Pero da Ponte, Se eu podesse desamar e Poys de mha morte gran sabor avedes, nelle quali il trovatore galego assume posizioni, al tempo stesso, irreligiose e anticortesi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it