MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121748788

Resource-Based View and Competitive Strategy: An Integrated Model of the Contribution of Information Technology to Firm Performance

2006· article· en· W3121748788 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Verreault, Suzanne Rivard, Louis Raymond

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfitability indexIndustrial organizationPerspective (graphical)BusinessVariance (accounting)Competitive advantageFirm offerResource-based viewResource (disambiguation)MarketingMicroeconomicsEconomicsComputer scienceAccountingFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the information technology (IT) literature, therelationship between IT and firm performance has been examined from aresource-based perspective and from the perspective of strategy. The goal ofthis study is to use the complementary nature of the two perspectives in orderto shed light on the contribution of IT to firm performance. A model that comprises both a competitive strategy framework and theresource-based perspective is used to achieve this objective. By depicting theeffects of IT support on business strategy and firm assets, the model capturesthe impact of IT on firm performance. Data from a survey of 96 Canadian firmsare used to test the model. According to the data, the variance in the sampled firms' market performanceis due, on the one hand,mostly to the direct effect of IT support forstrategy and the indirect effect of IT support for the firms' assets. Thevariance in profitability, on the other hand, is due to the direct effect of ITsupport for the firm's assets and by market performance. (SAA)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207