MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121752294

A Note on Monitoring Daily Economic Activity Via Electronic Transaction Data

2009· preprint· en· W3121752294 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John W. Galbraith, Greg Tkacz

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2009
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceBlackoutEconomyGeographyEconomicsArtPhysicsPower (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economists have traditionally relied on monthly or quarterly data supplied by central statistical agencies for macroeconomic monitoring. However, technological advances of the past several years have resulted in new high-frequency data sources that could potentially provide more accurate and timely information on the current level of economic activity. In this paper we explore the usefulness of electronic transactions as real-time indicators of economic activity, using Canadian debit card data, and using two potentially important economic events as examples. In particular we are able to analyze expenditure patterns around the September 11 terrorist attacks and the August 2003 electrical blackout, and are able to note qualitative differences in the effects of these events which could not be observed through aggregate measures. Les économistes se sont traditionnellement appuyés sur les données mensuelles ou trimestrielles publiées par les agences centrales de statistiques pour suivre la situation macroéconomique. Cependant, les avancées technologiques qui ont été réalisées au cours des dernières années ont entraîné de nouvelles sources de données à haute fréquence, et ces dernières pourraient potentiellement donner lieu à une information plus exacte et plus opportune sur l'état actuel de l'activité économique. Dans le document actuel, nous explorons l'utilité des transactions électroniques comme indicateurs en temps réel de l'activité économique. Pour ce faire, nous recourons aux données canadiennes sur les cartes de débit et utilisons, à titre d'exemples, deux événements économiques susceptibles d'être importants. Plus particulièrement, nous sommes en mesure d'analyser la structure des dépenses lors des attaques terroristes du 11 septembre et de la panne d'électricité d'août 2003 et de noter des différences qualitatives dans les répercussions de ces événements, lesquelles ne pourraient être observées en recourant aux mesures globales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207