MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE QUALITY OF MONETARY POLICY AND INFLATION PERFORMANCE: GLOBALIZATION AND ITS AFTERMATH*

2011· article· en· W3121752460 on OpenAlex
Martin T. Bohl, David G. Mayes, Pierre L. Siklos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueManchester School · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsInflation (cosmology)Monetary policyGlobalizationMonetary economicsKeynesian economicsMacroeconomicsInflation targetingQuality (philosophy)International economicsMarket economyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With few exceptions the last decades have seen reductions in inflation around the world. This experience is the result of many factors. In this paper, we seek to isolate one of the factors, namely, improvements in the quality of monetary policy. We estimate a gravity—like model and propose an exhaustive analysis of the potential role for a large number of institutional factors. Briefly, we find that institutional factors help explain inflation relative to the US experience, which is used as the benchmark. Nevertheless, a role for greater central bank autonomy is a feature of the 1980s and early 1990s only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it