Reconstruction Bias U-Net for Road Extraction From Optical Remote Sensing Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automatic road extraction from remote sensing images plays an important role for navigation, intelligent transportation, and road network update, etc. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods have presented many achievements for road extraction from remote sensing images. CNN-based methods require a large dataset with high quality labels for model training. However, there is still few standard and large dataset, which is specially designed for road extraction from optical remote sensing images. Besides, the existing end-to-end CNN models for road extraction from remote sensing images are usually with symmetric structure, studying on asymmetric structure between encoding and decoding is rare. To address the above problems, this article first provides a publicly available dataset LRSNY for road extraction from optical remote sensing images with manually labelled labels. Second, we propose a reconstruction bias U-Net for road extraction from remote sensing images. In our model, we increase the decoding branches to obtain multiple semantic information from different upsamplings. Experimental results show that our method achieves better performance compared with other six state-of-the-art segmentation models when testing on our LRSNY dataset. We also test on Massachusetts and Shaoshan datasets. The good performances on the two datasets further prove the effectiveness of our method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".