Structural and Thermal Evolution of an Infant Subduction Shear Zone: Insights From Sub‐Ophiolite Metamorphic Rocks Recovered From Oman Drilling Project Site BT‐1B
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Subduction interface thermal structure changes drastically within the first few million years of underthrusting (i.e., subduction infancy ). Metamorphic soles beneath ophiolites record snapshots of dynamic conditions and mechanical coupling during subduction infancy. Beneath the Samail Ophiolite (Oman), the sole comprises structurally higher high‐temperature (HT) and lower low‐temperature (LT) units. This inverted metamorphic gradient has been attributed to evolving metamorphic Pressure‐Temperature (P‐T) conditions during infancy; however, peak P‐T and timing of LT sole subduction are poorly constrained. Oman Drilling Project core BT‐1B sampled the base of the ophiolite in a location lacking the HT sole. Metasedimentary and meta‐mafic samples collected from 104 m of core reveal that the LT sole subducted to similar peak P as HT rocks preserved elsewhere in Oman, but experienced ∼300°C lower peak T. Prograde fabrics record Si‐in‐phengite and amphibole chemistries consistent with peak P‐T of ∼7–10 kbar and ∼450–550°C in the epidote‐amphibolite facies. Retrograde fabrics record a transition from near‐pervasive ductile to localized brittle strain under greenschist facies conditions. Titanite U‐Pb ages ( n = 2) constrain timing of peak LT sole subduction to ∼91 Ma (post‐dating initial HT sole subduction by ∼12–13 Myr) and dynamic retrogression through ∼90 Ma. Combined with existing geo/thermo‐chronology, our results support a model of protracted subduction and accretion while the infant subduction zone experienced multi‐phase, slow‐fast‐slow cooling. Temporal overlap of HT sole cooling (rehydration?) and ophiolite formation suggests that cooling may lead to interface weakening, facilitating upper‐plate extension and spreading. The LT sole formed in a rapidly‐refrigerating forearc after ophiolite formation and may reflect the transition to self‐sustaining subduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".