MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121788278 · doi:10.47976/rbhm2007v7n14193-211

LA ARITHMETICA PRACTICA DEL PADRE PADILLA Y LOS INICIOS DE LA MATEMÁTICA EN CENTRO AMÉRICA EN EL PERÍODO COLONIAL

2020· article· es· W3121788278 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies in Science
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtColonialismHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo se presenta un estudio de los métodos “avanzados” de resolución de problemas del segundo libro de matemáticas escrito en Centro América en el período colonial: la Aritmetica practica del Padre Padilla, publicada en 1732 en la ciudad de Antigua Guatemala. El estudio –hecho a partir de la único ejemplar sobrevivente– ofrece, en las primeras secciones, algunos datos biográficos de este matemático centro-americano y describe el contexto social y económico del que emerge la obra. En las siguientes secciones se hace un análisis de los problemas y métodos de resolución que aparecen en la misma. El estudio concluye con algunas conjeturas sobre los libros que –de alguna manera– pudieron haber servido de inspiración al padre Padilla en la elaboración de la Arithmetica practica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it