MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121807369 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2021.106800

Bloom announcement: Late season cyanobacterial blooms co-dominated by Microcystis flos-aquae, Lyngbya birgei, and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae complex in Hamilton Harbour (Lake Ontario), an area of concern impacted by industrial effluent and residential wastewater.

2021· article· en· W3121807369 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Arthur Zastepa, Camille Chemali

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsHarbourEutrophicationTributaryEffluentEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Water qualityWastewaterBayAlgal bloomGeographyOceanographyEcologyEnvironmental engineeringPhytoplanktonGeologyBiologyNutrient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hamilton Harbour is a large embayment (approximately 22 km2, over 2.8 × 108 m3, maximum depth 23 m, mean depth 13 m) at the western part of Lake Ontario with a long history of anthropogenic impacts, particularly from industrial effluent and residential wastewater [1]. Designated an area of concern (AOC) under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) in 1987, it continues to suffer from the buildup of hazardous chemicals in the water and sediments as well as eutrophication [3], [4], [5]. Several creeks (Spencer Creek, Redhill Creek, Grindstone Creek, Chedoke Creek) contribute to total water inflow (∼9.7 m3/sec) but a significant volume originates from two large wastewater treatment plants - the Woodward Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant (∼40%) servicing the city of Hamilton and the Skyward Wastewater Treatment Plant servicing the city of Burlington (∼13%) [6]. The most significant water exchange between Hamilton Harbour and the rest of Lake Ontario is via a narrow channel on the east side of Hamilton Harbour, the Burlington Shipping Canal [1]. In 2017, cyanobacterial and harmful algal blooms (cHABs) were observed and characterized along Bayfront Park Beach in Hamilton Harbour, Ontario, Canada (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). The beneficial use of Bayfront Park Beach has been classified as impaired for beneficial use impairment (BUI) #8, Eutrophication or Undesirable Algae, and BUI #10, Beach Closings and Water Contact Sports, under the Hamilton Harbour's Remedial Action Plan. As part of Environment and Climate Change Canada's Great Lakes Action Plan, monthly sampling of whole water grabs, within and outside the blooms, occurred from July to November inclusive. In July and August a mixed community of chlorophytes and cyanophytes dominated the bloom, which exceeded 100 mg/L in phytoplankton total biomass (TB) (Fig. 3) [2]. By September, this already high TB increased dramatically beyond 3,000 mg/L before subsiding below 50 mg/L in October, a likely consequence of more turbulent waters in early autumn (Fig. 3). The community in September was dominated by Microcystis (60% TB M. flos-aquae and 16% TB M. aeruginosa) and Lyngbya (15% TB L. birgei). In November, TB exceeded 4,500 mg/L, with M. flos-aquae expanding its dominance (95% TB) while L. birgei was replaced by Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, albeit with reduced biomass (3% TB) (Fig. 3). It is suspected, based on spatiotemporal observations of bloom dynamics and circulation patterns within Hamilton Harbour, that phytoplankton biomass proliferates offshore and is transported by winds and currents to Bayfront Park Beach, where it is captured and accumulates within its crescent-shaped shoreline (Fig. 1, Fig. 2) [7]. Open in a separate window Fig. 1 Satellite imagery (aerial view) of Bayfront Park Beach, Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario (Ontario, Canada) where samples of the 2017 cyanobacterial and harmful algal blooms were collected. Note the crescent shape of Bayfront Park Beach and adjacent parkland, making it susceptible to localized accumulations of material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207