Penguins and Polyamory: Using Law and Film to Explore the Essence of Marriage in Canadian Family Law
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article s’intéresse à la façon par laquelle les définitions juridiques de la famille se perpétuent dans la culture populaire et expose les débats récents au Canada portant sur la légalisation du mariage entre couples de même sexe et la criminalisation de la polygamie. En examinant l’immense succès du documentaire <i>La marche de l’empereur</i>, récipiendaire de la Academy Award, l’article pose des questions sur les images de la famille et du mariage, évoquées dans ce film, que se sont appropriées des militant-e-s des deux camps. L’article explore comment ces contestations de la notion traditionnelle de la famille au Canada ont eu pour effet paradoxal d’ériger une frontière plus rigide autour de la famille traditionnelle monogame et conjugale. L’auteure découvre en la protection du mariage une valeur fondamentale dans le contexte canadien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".