MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121930003 · doi:10.1039/d0cp05614f

A low cost, high accuracy method for halogen bonding complexes

2021· article· en· W3121930003 on OpenAlexafffund
Raphaël Robidas, Claude Y. Legault, Stefan M. Huber

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationCentre in Green Chemistry and CatalysisUniversité de SherbrookeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVerband der Chemischen Industrie
KeywordsONIOMHalogenHalogen bondComputational chemistryChemistryScheme (mathematics)Density functional theoryMoleculeOrganic chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ONIOM scheme M052X/[Def2TZVP+Def2TZVPD.ECP(I)]:AM1 is shown to represent halogen bond (XB) geometries nearly as well as DFT while being more than two orders of magnitude faster in systems containing >40 atoms. This finding is shown to hold for 40 XB donors, which cover most known backbones, and for a range of neutral and anionic Lewis bases. Complexation free energies can be accurately computed using these geometries and a single-point energy calculation at the DFT level. This approach circumvents the unfavorable scaling of computing time associated with modeling large systems involving halogen bonding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207