MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121937631 · doi:10.1109/taes.2021.3086888

Global Descriptors for Visual Pose Estimation of a Noncooperative Target in Space Rendezvous

2021· article· en· W3121937631 on OpenAlexaff
Anthea Comellini, Jérôme Le Ny, Emmanuel Zenou, Christine Espinosa, Vincent Dubanchet

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRendezvousPoseRobustness (evolution)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceEstimator3D pose estimationComputer visionInvariant (physics)Object detectionZernike polynomialsSpacecraftPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article revisits methods based on global descriptors to estimate the pose of a known object using a monocular camera, in the context of space rendezvous between an autonomous spacecraft and a noncooperative target. These methods estimate the pose by detection, i.e., they do not require any prior information about the pose of the observed object, making them suitable for initial pose acquisition and the monitoring of faults in other on-board estimators. We consider here specifically methods that retrieve the pose of a known object using a precomputed set of invariants and geometric moments. Three classes of global invariant features are analyzed, based on complex moments, Zernike moments, and Fourier descriptors. The robustness, accuracy, and computational efficiency of the different invariants are tested and compared under various conditions. We also discuss certain implementation aspects of the method that lead to improved accuracy and efficiency over previously reported results. Overall, our results can be used to identify which variations of the method offer a sufficiently fast and robust solution for pose estimation by detection, with low computational requirements that are compatible with space-qualified processors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic SystemsSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207