MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122010009 · doi:10.1063/5.0038188

Exploring the next step in micro-solvation of CO in water: Infrared spectra and structural calculations of (H2O)4–CO and (D2O)4–CO

2021· article· en· W3122010009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCarbon monoxideInfrared spectroscopyAb initioRing (chemistry)SolvationAb initio quantum chemistry methodsSpectral lineInfraredSpectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend studies of micro-solvation of carbon monoxide by a combination of high-resolution IR spectroscopy and ab initio calculations. Spectra of the (H2O)4–CO and (D2O)4–CO pentamers are observed in the C–O stretch fundamental region (≈2150 cm−1). The H2O containing spectrum is broadened by predissociation, but that of D2O is sharp, enabling detailed analysis that gives a precise band origin and rotational parameters. Ab initio calculations are employed to confirm the assignment to (water)4–CO and to determine the structure in which the geometry of the (water)4 fragment is a cyclic ring very similar to the isolated water tetramer. The CO fragment is located “above” the ring plane, with a partial hydrogen bond between the C atom and one of the “free” protons (deuterons) of the water tetramer. Together with the previous results on D2O–CO, (D2O)2–CO, and (D2O)3–CO, this represents a probe of the four initial steps in the solvation of carbon monoxide at a high resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it