Exploring the next step in micro-solvation of CO in water: Infrared spectra and structural calculations of (H2O)4–CO and (D2O)4–CO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We extend studies of micro-solvation of carbon monoxide by a combination of high-resolution IR spectroscopy and ab initio calculations. Spectra of the (H2O)4–CO and (D2O)4–CO pentamers are observed in the C–O stretch fundamental region (≈2150 cm−1). The H2O containing spectrum is broadened by predissociation, but that of D2O is sharp, enabling detailed analysis that gives a precise band origin and rotational parameters. Ab initio calculations are employed to confirm the assignment to (water)4–CO and to determine the structure in which the geometry of the (water)4 fragment is a cyclic ring very similar to the isolated water tetramer. The CO fragment is located “above” the ring plane, with a partial hydrogen bond between the C atom and one of the “free” protons (deuterons) of the water tetramer. Together with the previous results on D2O–CO, (D2O)2–CO, and (D2O)3–CO, this represents a probe of the four initial steps in the solvation of carbon monoxide at a high resolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".