La mise en lumière des indépendants. Le mythe de l’artiste isolé chez les écrivains symbolistes français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inspired by the thinking of art sociologists like Nathalie Heinich, Pierre Bourdieu and Dario Gamboni, this article examines how a particular group of writers on the rise, the symbolist generation active in the late nineteenth century, engaged in promoting a certain artistic ideal that would in return enhance and legitimize their own aesthetic agenda and position. The young novelists and poets writing art criticism in the small literary magazines that proliferated in symbolist circles became the champions of the new independent painters exhibiting outside traditional art institutions. Going against the grain of positivist thinking, that tied the art producer to his own historic, geographic and social circumstances, they resuscitated the romantic figure of the misunderstood solitary genius, at once a saint and a prophet, towering above the crowd and waiting to be discovered. This was, of course, the very image they wanted to project of themselves. That is why they remained faithful to this archetype, even in the face of professional success, their protégés’ and their own.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".