Deformation features of cross-glued wooden panel structures for northern construction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cross-glued wood panels are used in various areas of construction. In recent years, such panels are widely used in multi-storey panel and multi-storey frame construction. The use of panels in multi-storey residential and public construction is based on such an important natural property of wood as dissipativity - the ability to absorb a wide range of dynamic effects, including seismic effects. The structural form of buildings in modern high-rise construction is based mainly on a steel or reinforced concrete frame. High-rise buildings on a frame made of wooden glued elements, with wooden outer and inner panels began to be introduced into the construction practice 15 years ago. To date, residential and public buildings made of wooden cross-glued panels have been built in many countries of Europe and in the USA, Canada, Australia. It can be expected that in high-rise construction, the share of residential and public buildings with the use of wooden glued structures will increase, and will stabilize over time in an objectively justified indicator. The demand for wooden high-rise construction will be determined, among other factors, by the seismicity of the construction areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".