Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous analysons les perspectives selon lesquelles des anges membres d'un groupe structurés d'anges canadiens envisagent la disposition de leurs placements. Ces anges investissent des montants de l'ordre de 1,2 millions de dollar dans des entreprises technologiques et l'émission initiale est, de ce fait, une option de sortie envisageable. Toutefois, les anges énoncent une préférence marquée pour la cession en bloc de leurs actions à des acquéreurs stratégiques. Cette préférence est cohérente avec l'hypothèse des économies d'échelles : pour les entreprises innovantes, il est essentiel d'acquérir rapidement une taille suffisante à l'exploitation rapide des innovations, et l'acquisition par un joueur important du domaine est un moyen plus efficace d'acquérir cette taille que l'émission initiale. Toutefois, la réglementation des valeurs mobilières est également perçue comme un obstacle majeur aux émissions initiales
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".