MétaCan
← all works

Construct validity and reliability of the Concussion Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT).

2020· article· en· 2 citations· W3122270438 on OpenAlex

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: medium

Psychometric validation of a concussion knowledge instrument; domain measurement validation rather than a study of research practice.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

It evaluates the validity and reliability of a concussion knowledge instrument, not research methods themselves.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Psychometric validation of a clinical concussion-knowledge tool for chiropractors, not research methods.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the concussion knowledge assessment tool (CKAT) as a measure of knowledge of concussion and its management among chiropractic subgroups and to compare these properties for two scoring strategies for the CKAT. METHODS: Three chiropractic subgroups (first year students, interns and sports chiropractors) completed the CKAT via SurveyMonkey with as second administration two to six weeks later for a subset of respondents. Scatter plots and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were used for test-retest reliability. A priori hypotheses regarding the relationship of CKAT scores across known subgroups, and with concussion knowledge self-rankings were established prior to data collection. Distributions of CKAT scores were compared across the subgroups using boxplots and ANOVA for known groups validity, and correlation of CKAT scores with concussion knowledge self-ranking was examined. RESULTS: =17.54; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The CKAT distinguished between chiropractic subgroups expected to have different levels of knowledge, supporting construct validity, however, it did not achieve adequate test-retest reliability.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
PubMed
Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Funders
Keywords
ConcussionIntraclass correlationChiropracticConstruct validityTest (biology)MedicineReliability (semiconductor)PsychologyPhysical therapyClinical psychologyPsychometricsPoison controlInjury preventionAlternative medicinePathology
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes