MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Construct validity and reliability of the Concussion Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT).

2020· article· en· 2 citations· W3122270438 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : aff_core · poids de sondage : 5595.24 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: medium

Psychometric validation of a concussion knowledge instrument; domain measurement validation rather than a study of research practice.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

It evaluates the validity and reliability of a concussion knowledge instrument, not research methods themselves.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Psychometric validation of a clinical concussion-knowledge tool for chiropractors, not research methods.

Résumé

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the concussion knowledge assessment tool (CKAT) as a measure of knowledge of concussion and its management among chiropractic subgroups and to compare these properties for two scoring strategies for the CKAT. METHODS: Three chiropractic subgroups (first year students, interns and sports chiropractors) completed the CKAT via SurveyMonkey with as second administration two to six weeks later for a subset of respondents. Scatter plots and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were used for test-retest reliability. A priori hypotheses regarding the relationship of CKAT scores across known subgroups, and with concussion knowledge self-rankings were established prior to data collection. Distributions of CKAT scores were compared across the subgroups using boxplots and ANOVA for known groups validity, and correlation of CKAT scores with concussion knowledge self-ranking was examined. RESULTS: =17.54; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The CKAT distinguished between chiropractic subgroups expected to have different levels of knowledge, supporting construct validity, however, it did not achieve adequate test-retest reliability.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
PubMed
Thématique
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Domaine
Medicine
Établissements canadiens
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
ConcussionIntraclass correlationChiropracticConstruct validityTest (biology)MedicineReliability (semiconductor)PsychologyPhysical therapyClinical psychologyPsychometricsPoison controlInjury preventionAlternative medicinePathology
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui