Hydrogen bonds dominated frictional stick-slip of cellulose nanocrystals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crystalline cellulose, the most abundant natural polymer on earth, features exceptional physical and mechanical properties. Using atomistic simulation, this study reports the mechanical behavior of cellulose-cellulose nanocrystal hydrophilic interface and systematically examines the impact of loading direction, interfacial moisture, misalignment and surface types. The density, orientation or distribution of interfacial hydrogen bonds are shown to explain the series of findings presented here, including stick-slip behavior, stiffness recovery after an irreversible slip, direction-dependent behavior and weakening induced by hydration or misalignment. Correlation analysis shows that, regardless of the various loading conditions, the interfacial stress, shear velocity and interaction energy are strongly correlated with the density of interfacial hydrogen bonds, which quantitatively supports the central role of hydrogen bonding. Based on this correlation, the friction force rendered by a single hydrogen bond is inferred to be fHB ∼1.3 E-10 N under a shearing speed of 1 m s−1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".