La révocation des institutrices antillaises sous Vichy (1940-1943)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse l’application à la Martinique et à la Guadeloupe de la loi du 11 octobre 1940 relative à la réglementation du travail féminin. Il permet de combler une triple omission historiographique : celle des institutrices dans l’histoire de l’éducation, celle de ce corps professionnel dans l’histoire des femmes et celle des femmes dans l’enseignement colonial. Il se propose d’examiner les modalités de mise en œuvre de la loi du 11 octobre 1940 dans la métropole et aux Antilles, son instrumentalisation par divers acteurs et les arguments mobilisés lors de son adoption dans le contexte antillais. Il appréhende ensuite à quel degré les institutrices antillaises furent touchées par ces mesures et les véritables motifs de leur révocation. Puis, il met en relief le contexte plus global d’une réorganisation administrative, scolaire et sociale dans laquelle s’inscrivent les révocations et les réactions des enseignantes antillaises face à ces réformes. L’article interroge également les continuités des discriminations subies par les femmes fonctionnaires avant et sous Vichy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".