MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122510352 · doi:10.1002/nano.202000149

Permanent encoding of nano‐ to macro‐scale hierarchies of order from evaporative magnetic fluids

2021· article· en· W3122510352 on OpenAlexaff
Tianyu Zhong, Mark P. Andrews, P. Fournier, Maxime Dion

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Select · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de PointeUniversité de SherbrookeMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerrofluidMaterials scienceChemical physicsMagnetic fieldMagnetizationMagnetic nanoparticlesComplex fluidNanocompositeMetastabilityNanotechnologyNanoparticleCondensed matter physicsChemistryPhysicsThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnetic field‐directed assemblies of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in ferrofluids exhibit complex interconvertible metastable patterns and structures. Formally, ferrofluid patterns are unstable – they disappear when the magnetic field is removed. The present study shows that ferrofluid patterns can be “trapped” as kinetically stable structures that encode a surprising degree of morphological detail over nanometer to millimeter length scales. An external magnetic field is used to direct assembly of oleic acid‐decorated magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) nanoparticles to make spike and labyrinthine patterns in volatile host solvents of heptane, octane and nonane. Solvent evaporation coupled with increases in sample magnetization drive pattern formation and its permanent recording. Use of a crosslinking siloxane polymer host yields remarkably different material responses. From the trapped states in both fluid systems, previously unreported hierarchies of order emerge in nanocomposite spike structures that also exhibit orientational and magnetic anisotropy. The possibility of designing hierarchical matter from initially uncorrelated MNPs is demonstrated by a directed solid‐state transformation of the magnetic nanocomposite; the spikes template memory of their origin onto the transformation products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano SelectSame topicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207