Stereoscopic Image Retargeting Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stereoscopic image retargeting aims at converting stereoscopic images to the target resolution adaptively. Different from 2D image retargeting, stereoscopic image retargeting needs to preserve both the shape structure of salient objects and depth consistency of 3D scenes. In this paper, we present a stereoscopic image retargeting method based on deep convolutional neural network to obtain high-quality retargeted images with both object shape preservation and scene depth preservation. First, a cross-attention extraction mechanism is constructed to generate attention map, which contains the valuable attention features of the left and right images and the common attention features between them. Second, since the disparity map can provide accurate depth information of objects in 3D scenes, a disparity-assisted 3D significance map generation module is utilized to further preserve the valuable depth information of stereoscopic images. Finally, in order to predict the retargeted stereoscopic images accurately, an image consistency loss is developed to preserve the geometric structure of salient objects, and a disparity consistency loss is introduced to eliminate depth distortions. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed deep convolutional neural network can provide favorable stereoscopic image retargeting results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it