MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122695754

[no title]

2020· article· en· W3122695754 on OpenAlex
Ł. Wyrzykowski, P. Mróz, K. A. Rybicki, M. Gromadzki, Z. Kołaczkowski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionVillum FondenUniversity of EdinburghQueen's UniversityIntegrated Electronics Engineering Center, Binghamton UniversityInstitut de Ciències del CosmosEuropean Space AgencySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryFoundation for Research and Technology-HellasNational Research FoundationJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaJet Propulsion LaboratoryKazan Federal UniversityEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemScience and Technology Facilities CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeLietuvos Mokslo TarybaScience Mission DirectorateCenter for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Ohio State UniversityUniversity of CreteGordon and Betty Moore FoundationAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaChinese Academy of SciencesDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Research Foundation of KoreaOhio State UniversityMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaLos Alamos National LaboratoryFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejUniversities Space Research AssociationChinese Academy of Sciences South America Center for AstronomyW. M. Keck FoundationSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Central UniversityIsrael Cancer Research FundGoddard Space Flight CenterJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of LeicesterMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiQueen's University BelfastEuropean CommissionCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDurham UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionLiverpool John Moores UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGravitational microlensingPhysicsLight curveAstrophysicsAstronomyBinary numberEccentricity (behavior)Orbital inclinationEvent (particle physics)ParallaxOrbital periodOrbital motionMass ratioOrbital elementsStars
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gaia16aye was a binary microlensing event discovered in the direction towards the northern Galactic disc and was one of the first microlensing events detected and alerted to by the Gaia space mission. Its light curve exhibited five distinct brightening episodes, reaching up to I = 12 mag, and it was covered in great detail with almost 25 000 data points gathered by a network of telescopes. We present the photometric and spectroscopic follow-up covering 500 days of the event evolution. We employed a full Keplerian binary orbit microlensing model combined with the motion of Earth and Gaia around the Sun to reproduce the complex light curve. The photometric data allowed us to solve the microlensing event entirely and to derive the complete and unique set of orbital parameters of the binary lensing system. We also report on the detection of the first-ever microlensing space-parallax between the Earth and Gaia located at L2. The properties of the binary system were derived from microlensing parameters, and we found that the system is composed of two main-sequence stars with masses 0.57 ± 0.05 M⊙ and 0.36 ± 0.03 M⊙ at 780 pc, with an orbital period of 2.88 years and an eccentricity of 0.30. We also predict the astrometric microlensing signal for this binary lens as it will be seen by Gaia as well as the radial velocity curve for the binary system. Events such as Gaia16aye indicate the potential for the microlensing method of probing the mass function of dark objects, including black holes, in directions other than that of the Galactic bulge. This case also emphasises the importance of long-term time-domain coordinated observations that can be made with a network of heterogeneous telescopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it