MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122699484

Cambiamento climatico e modelli di filiere agro-energetiche: l’esperienza delle Regioni del Canada occidentale

2012· article· it· W3122699484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lorenza Paoloni

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricoltura Istituzioni Mercati · 2012
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il cambiamento climatico ? un?emergenza che riguarda sia il nord che il sud del mondo e minaccia la sicurezza alimentare del pianeta con modalit? diverse poich? riduce la biodiversit?, modifica le coltivazioni ed incrementa la povert?. Un?importante risposta per contrastare i dannosi effetti del cambiamento climatico ? il potenziamento dei legami tra agricoltura e foreste, attraverso pratiche di agricoltura sostenibile che riducono la deforestazione e contribuiscono a rendere pi? vivibili le aree rurali. Inoltre ? opportuno prendere in considerazione le possibili relazioni contrattuali fra agricoltori e produttori di energia nell?ambito della filiera agroenergetica che vede gli agricoltori utilizzare il legno per la produzione di energia rinnovabile. In Canada si sta realizzando un?interessante, anche dal punto di vista giuridico, esperienza di produzione di energia rinnovabile sfruttando le biomasse che residuano dall?intervento demolitore di un coleottero che distrugge il legno. Si tratta di una filiera agroenergetica di ultima generazione che si affianca ad altre gi? esistenti ed operanti nel vasto territorio canadese

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricoltura Istituzioni MercatiSame topicForest Management and PolicyFrench-language works237,207