MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122733401 · doi:10.4000/books.puc.12267

Le désir séculaire : les XVIe et XVIIe siècles contrastés d’Alexandre Dumas

2020· book-chapter· fr· W3122733401 on OpenAlex
Maxime Prévost

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Caen eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alexandre Dumas est le grand romancier de l’échec : échec héroïque, mais aussi échec amoureux. N’en déplaise à Roger Nimier, Athos est le seul mousquetaire amoureux et son amour se révèle maudit ; comme par atavisme, Bragelonne court à sa perte par dépit amoureux. C’est que le Grand Siècle d’Alexandre Dumas n’est pas le XVIIe (qui serait plutôt celui de la déchéance, notamment amoureuse) mais bien le XVIe (l’admiration que porte Athos à son ancêtre Enguerrand de La Fère est emblématique), sur tous les plans, dont celui de l’Éros. En effet, le passé qui inspire tout particulièrement Athos est le XVIe siècle, époque où, selon lui, l’idéal chevaleresque avait encore cours et où, suggère Dumas, il se trouvait encore des poètes pour magnifier ces exploits. Or la magnification du XVIe siècle dans l’œuvre de Dumas n’est jamais aussi explicite qu’en ce qui a trait à l’Éros.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it